Talk:Munition
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Munition redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
=Untitled
[edit]cryptography and its history as well as software protection and such stuf uses the word Munition for the fortification of software and such. There is no need to redirect to Am-munition witch is the destruction of such fortification. 85.220.89.25 (talk) 19:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Is cryptography in U.S. still regarded as munition? --195.210.230.161 11:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Munition page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Munition" page.
Categories:
- Redirect-Class Cold War articles
- NA-importance Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- Redirect-Class military history articles
- Redirect-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Redirect-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles