Talk:Banisteriopsis caapi
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Banisteriopsis caapi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Categories:
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Illegal in France
[edit]There is an administrative comment in the /Legal Issues/Legality section after the description of the situation in France, which reads "contradictory". The text is not contradictory, the person inserting the edit comment has simply failed to understand the text. It is quite straightforward: a legal case in France yielded a ruling that the plant was not a chemical extraction and therefore not illegal despite containing an illegal ("scheduled") chemical, as the plant itself was not scheduled. This resulted in the plant being scheduled to plug this loophole, so it's now illegal to possess in France. Simple, clear, not in the least contradictory. Happy now? 2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:F81C:BE5E:1032:DAD7 (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)JustSomeWikiReader