User talk:MSGJ

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Your draft article, Draft:Rebecca Hermosillo

Hello, MSGJ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rebecca Hermosillo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questions from SanctuaryOnSchoolAve on Stand by Me (film) (17:23, 15 September 2024)

Please review two citation references for proper Wikipedia house style that document recommended update to Legacy section of Stand By Me (film) entry.
How does one insert a bracketed superscript reference number and link/tie it to the proper source? Also, do prior successive reference numbers automatically get re-numbered?

--SanctuaryOnSchoolAve (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The refernces look to be are formatted well. We wouldn't generally include facebook as a source because it is not regarded as reliable, so that one should probably be removed. Yes successive references will be renumbered (but it is possible to re-use the same source, in which case it could have the same number as a previous one). Hope that makes sense — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:13, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create nonexistent templates

Please do not create transclusions of nonexistent templates. It populates Wikipedia:Database reports/Transclusions of non-existent templates, and then another gnome needs to fix your fix. I recommend removing one of the braces on either end instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did not create a template — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I misspoke. You created transclusions of nonexistent templates. Please refrain from doing so. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Chris M Horwitz (16:47, 22 September 2024)

Hello. I have made two edits recentlly, the more important of which was in Maxwell's Equations where there is a significantly wrong original entry which has been leading people astray for a long time. My correction was however removed without any communication with me. I would think Wikipedia would be using competent members to consider proposed edits but in this case I consider this to be an egregious lack of knowledge of the topic; someone expert in the field should re-consider my edit. At the very least I would expect the editor would communicate with me. For the second edit, on the history of William Shockley, I have had a helpful discussion with the editor who removed my edit - and that is fine, I will work on it and re-submit after I have downloaded the appropriate reference to your Commons. --Chris M Horwitz (talk) 16:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So if your edit is reverted, the next step is usually to open a discussion on the talk page, in this case Talk:Maxwell's equations. There you can present your point of view or ask the other editor to explain why they reverted. I will open a discussion there for you now — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris M Horwitz there is a response on the article's talk page. Please view and reply there — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my proposed edit; after looking over the correct cross-product terms it's apparent that the moving diagram and its attendant field equations are correct as shown. My apologies for trying to spread disinformation! Chris M Horwitz (talk) 14:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from The scribeman (00:00, 25 September 2024)

Hi! While I was editing I found out some anti social editors reverted my edits with a personal agenda of defaming a particular caste group. It is very immoral to defame and spread mis informations about a particular community. Help me protect that page people constantly alter the page with misinformations I shall provide you legit government records supporting my side of informations. Thankyou --The scribeman (talk) 00:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Jly44 (18:29, 28 September 2024)

Hi Martin can you write and edit it for me? --Jly44 (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Write or edit what? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Worldpeaceisthebestthing (04:07, 29 September 2024)

Hi Martin, You sound cool. --Worldpeaceisthebestthing (talk) 04:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320

Online events:

New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon

Tip of the month:

Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Question from JaneBetTol (22:31, 29 September 2024)

I need to correct a mistake that a member of the public added to my bio. I tried three times to do it and save it on my laptop but couldn’t do it. Not sure why. Now trying on my iPhone. Can you help me? --JaneBetTol (talk) 22:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Andrej Kral

Hello, MSGJ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrej Kral, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Articles with Danish List of Lights and Fog signals identifiers

A tag has been placed on Category:Articles with Danish List of Lights and Fog signals identifiers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]