Talk:Wilhelm

Moving Mistake

The history on this page before 26/04/2005, when Axezz "moved" the page, is really the history for Wilhelm (Xenosaga). -- Revolver Ocelot 23:29, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

For the record, this has been fixed, probably long ago (see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wilhelm_%28Xenosaga%29&action=history&year=2005 ) – Fayenatic London 12:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelm dominate article, not William

The 'Wilhelm' article seems to be more of a "did you mean?" article. While the 'William' article is the main one. Even though William is merely a derivative of Wilhelm. Should it not be reversed?

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.183.92.40 (talk) 14:40, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It probably makes sense this way, with the main article on the English version of the name, as this is English Wikipedia. – Fayenatic London 12:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]