Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: semi-protection Vandalism from both sides particularly IP addresses, whether there was attack against police or minorities. While in reality, it was both.

    Reason: Rolling IPs copying different article into this one. The same person vandalizing International Commerce Centre (the sister building). A page protection was added a few days ago to that article, this one needs also. This is a LTA involving many buildings, still researching extent. GreenC 15:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Falls under the purview of Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:44, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA/AC target. Panian513 19:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: Romanos I Lekapenos (talk · contribs) blocked by Alexf. This is a weird LTV situation where the vandal came back after almost two years of inactivity. Please re-request if another sockpuppet arises. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 20:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Part of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Felicia (talk) 20:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~delta (talkcont) 21:01, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Vandalism arie (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jdcomix (talk) 00:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GraziePrego (talk) 00:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 01:20, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 02:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of "Mount Egmont". ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High IP vandalism. The corresponding IP user was blocked for short term two days back but has returned as soon as the block ended. Need a longer block on IP/page protection. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 07:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 2409:408c:2ccc:4633::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Red-tailed hawk. This time for a week. Favonian (talk) 19:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A blocked account (Fenam12 (talk · contribs)), one new account (Ckfrlgud1 (talk · contribs) and several IP addresses - quite possibly the same person - insist on changing the picture, without having the license. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 10:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Edit dispute arie (talk) 10:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The only contributions to this article are from socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Afv12e. Should be ECP'ed under WP:GS/CASTE/WP:CT/IPA. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Various users (Wasp19455 and IP editors) keep removing the photo without explaining why. I've left messages on two IP talk pages, but a new one just reverted my latest edit. = paul2520 💬 14:30, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Requesting WP:ARBAP2 enforcement, as disruptive edits around Harris's race have been ongoing since she was elevated to presidential nominee. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:46, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jdcomix (talk) 15:36, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: IP users and non-confirmed accounts have repeatedly edited the page to perform the same disruptive edit of changing Michael Flynn's party affiliation from Democrat to Republican, in spite of users repeatedly pointing out that he was a registered Democrat at the relevant time. TRCRF22 (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High levels of vandalism by IP users and likely socks over the last three years. It's likely the vandalism is coming from one or multiple students attending this school. I find it likely vandalism will return under a new account in the near future. I'd recommend semi-protection for the page. Solitaire Wanderer (talk) 15:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Jdcomix (talk) 16:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 16:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Actually, I've done it by issuing a warning to the latest member of 67.233.0.0/16 editing the article. If they carry on, a partial block from the article will likely be imposed on the entire range. Favonian (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    User(s) blocked. The above-mentioned range has been blocked from editing the article for 3 months. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: WP:RUSUKR; see unsourced addition made by IP editor here SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 16:58, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent for Vandalism, some IPs users keep editing and disrupting the list of film series and others as well NSAandGCHQ (talk) 17:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism & vandalism from newly-created accounts. Ronnnaldo7 (talk) 17:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Please also enforce WP:CT/IRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:30, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism and persistent IP sock puppetry Due to current events going on within the subject. Can someone semi-protect this page? Thank you. James Conan Niag (talk) 18:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Weekly addition of unsourced BLP content about his parents, mainly from a 26xx IP. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Vandalism resumed not even an hour after previous PP expired. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:35, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Repeated disruption. Looking at the history, maybe indef ECP could be justified? I dunno, protection policy isn't something I'm fluent in. Leaving to more educated minds to make the call. 78.149.135.163 (talk) 20:41, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Per arbitration enforcement WP:GENSEX. Raladic (talk) 21:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: The user who requested protection (User:DJ InstaMalik) has been blocked as a sockpuppet account of the page creator, and they were likely attempting to misuse page protection for ulterior motives. Upon reviewing the page history, most IP edits appear to be constructive, so this protection would seem unnecessary. Since I’m unable to post on the protecting admin’s talk page, I’m submitting the request here. 2405:201:D002:319D:E5F7:B9B3:B48E:C0E (talk) 08:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Daniel Case: Any thoughts? Lectonar (talk) 08:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Farshwal (talk) 19:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    The title is misleading - there have been none in Wales. The page mentions N Wales Police sending reinforcements, and says that there were anti-fascist gatherings in Cardiff to protest expected events that did not happen and 'some far-right demonstrators outside the Senedd, though no conflict materialised' So no riots in Wales. StillMum (talk) 01:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.