Jump to content

Talk:Third Epistle to the Corinthians

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Language

[edit]

So, would one be safe in assume this was written in Greek?  allixpeeke (talk) 05:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Greek is the language of the oldest manuscript surviving, and in addition the other language versions show signs of being translated from Greek. I'll add a note to that effect to the article.[1]

References

  1. ^ G. J. Reinink; Alexander Cornelis Klugkist (January 1999). After Bardaisan: Studies on Continuity and Change in Syriac Christianity in Honour of Professor Han J.W. Drijvers. Peeters Publishers. p. 53. ISBN 978-90-429-0735-5.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Third Epistle to the Corinthians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest merger

[edit]

I'm not sure why Epistle of the Corinthians to Paul is a separate article. 3 Corinthians is presented as a grouped correspondence - the sources don't separate out the letter & its response. They pretty clearly had the same authors / source. Any objections to merging that article into this one? SnowFire (talk) 02:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Authorship section=

[edit]

The Authorship section contains only one source (Bart Ehrman). Does this mean that all the analysis in this section is the scholarly opinion of Ehrman? The text should clarify this. Ashmoo (talk) 09:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]