Jump to content

Talk:Ico

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleIco is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 15, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 22, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Latest working link on wayback machine https://web.archive.org/web/20151023161221/http://www.icothegame.com/ gahrons (talk) 01:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgio de Chirico as a surrealist

[edit]

The article currently labels Giorgio de Chirico as a surrealist, based on a quotation from Fumito Ueda. The source only quotes Ueda, who is not an authority, as well as uses the more ambiguous "surrealistic", which could refer to a general trait rather than the movement. The article on Chirico clearly states that he influenced the surrealists, not the other way around. The painting in question was created several years before the surrealist movement was launched (the word had previously been coined by Guillaume Apollinaire, but with a different meaning, and Chirico had not adopted it). It's clearly wrong to attribute a painter to a movement he was not a part of based on Ueda's mistake or broader use of the word "surrealistic". Smetanahue (talk) 14:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do note our article on Chirico incorporates him as both metaphysical and surrealist, and just because Nostalgia.. proceeds the surrealist movement doesn't necessary mean calling Chirico surrealist is wrong since his later works were considered that. Here though, we could go two ways: remove the surrealist label altogether, where in the caption this would not be a problem but would be an odd absence in the body; or to say both metaphysical/surrealist, which only weighs down the caption. --MASEM (t) 14:43, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Chirico was never a member of the surrealist group. He had his metaphysical thing going on, and later on switched to a more classicist or baroque style. His article only states that the surrealists were influenced by him (as were several other movements). I'm fine with Ueda's quote staying in the article, perhaps with an added [sic], but Wikipedia itself shouldn't make this claim. Smetanahue (talk) 14:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be fair to call him a modernist in WP's voice (if I understand correctly, both metaphysical and surrealist fall into that), and leave the "surrealist" quote? --MASEM (t) 14:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, that would work. We could also just skip the labels altogether if it becomes too contrived. It's obviously not central to the subject of this article. Smetanahue (talk) 15:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Ico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack Tracklist

[edit]

I think it would be a great idea to add a tracklist to the soundtrack and more info about it. 2601:601:1401:A700:899:C8AB:DF6:D887 (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]