Jump to content

Talk:Big lie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


About China's "committing human rights abuses against Uyghurs in Xinjiang"[edit]

this accusation currently has no conclusion, so it's inappropriate to label this thing as "big lie". Coddlebean (talk) 06:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried adding "pov section", but it got reverted Coddlebean (talk) 06:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ask yourself one question: "Is that content backed by a RS?" Whether there is "no conclusion" is rather irrelevant. Accusations, in this case a false one by CCP, are common, and they are misusing the term "big lie" in their defense. If there's a better way to frame and word the content, feel free to improve it. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sources will do what they do, we just follow the sources. What would be innaproriate would be trying to overrule the sources with a personal POV, I hope thats not what you're attempting. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Objectivity[edit]

If you want to viewed as a credible source for information and to continue to receive donations from readers such as myself, it is important to me that you maintain a broad, fair and objective presentation of the facts. I do not believe this is happening. Biased reporting about the “Big Lie”, steal your credibility and promotes a lack of interest in what is on your site - because it is not credible. I want both sides of the truth. 2600:1700:4E1:8380:CFB:74FA:9759:5F64 (talk) 17:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then tell us what you think isn't objective, using reliable sources to support your assertions. Acroterion (talk) 18:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]