Jump to content

User talk:Mumonkan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Video blog article

[edit]

Hi Mumonkan,

I'm looking to get the video blog article expanded and I noticed you've contributed to the article in the past. It would be great if you could check it out again. It could use some help. Thanks. Pdelongchamp 22:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


3rd party references would be useful to establish notability. Also inline citations, per ref guide posted above, help to establish credibility. Tyrenius (talk) 23:12, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Guide to referencing

[edit]

Click on "show" to open contents.

Wild Me moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Wild Me, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wildbook moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Wildbook, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wild Me (May 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DannyS712 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DannyS712 (talk) 22:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mumonkan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DannyS712 (talk) 22:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wildbook (May 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DannyS712 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DannyS712 (talk) 22:57, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wild Me, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:14, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wildbook, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wild Me

[edit]

Hello, Mumonkan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wild Me".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:38, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wildbook

[edit]

Hello, Mumonkan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wildbook".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 05:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Wiley's Seaplane Port has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources about seaplane port

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of U.S. state aromas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Is a list with a single listing, as no other states have an official aroma.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of U.S. state aromas for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of U.S. state aromas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. state aromas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JML1148 (talk | contribs) 01:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gridcosm-795-796-zoom.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Gridcosm-795-796-zoom.png, which you've attributed to https://www.sito.org/cgi-bin/gridcosm/gridcosm?level=795. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gridcosm-795-artistmap.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Gridcosm-795-artistmap.png, which you've attributed to https://www.sito.org/cgi-bin/gridcosm/gridcosm?level=795. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 14:20, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gridcosm

[edit]

Thanks for resolving this!

How are we meant to interpret the distinction in Completed level images are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic License. (This does not apply to individual pieces by single artists.), though? Doesn't every completed level image include eight individual pieces by single artists, at as high a resolution as they were submitted?

And should the eight artists be attributed by name, in each case, or the work as a whole to "Gridcosm"? (I guess we probably shouldn't try to attribute all the thousands of artists whose work is implicit in the central pixels...) Belbury (talk) 09:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it is a valid and long-standing question. for the history of sito (we are in our 30th year!), collaborative works have always been considered usable by sito (the site/"organization") in whatever manner we wished. whenever we use a full level (9 images combined into 1, by any number of artists), that final single image is what is available under cc-by-sa. since a single artist made each individual piece with intention to be part of this collaboration, we do not allow the same license on these small squares. (which technically one can get to with a specific url.)
technically under cc-by-sa, i guess someone could chop that final full level into exact 1/9 pieces and get back the individual pieces, but i consider that a weird edge case that i am unable to fully understand how it could be resolved. i guess this is what you are talking about. i suppose if someone made a collage from magazines, claimed it was available under cc-by-sa, then someone took that and cropped out just the coca-cola logo within it and claimed that was available for cc-by-sa, it would keep the lawyers busy.
if there is some clearer wording i can put on gridcosm, let me know. as i said, i am no lawyer. but if this divisible edge case is blocking the thing from being used in wikipedia, so be it, i can drop the illustrative images from the article. the weirdness of sito has been that weird for 30 years, so i am slightly less worried about that.  :) Jon Lon Sito (talk) 18:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]