Talk:Galois module
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]What is the G for which we are considering O_L as an O_K[G]-module?
- The Galois group of L over K. Charles Matthews 09:40, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
Noether's theorem
[edit]"Then Noether's theorem states that tame ramification is necessary and sufficient for OL to be a projective module over Z[G]. It is certainly therefore necessary for it to be a free module." Not every projective module is free, so these two sentences are confusing when taken together. Not familiar with Noether's theorem so can't correct it. Someone please fix. 74.112.174.192 14:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Tame ramification is necessary to be projective. Free is a stronger condition than projective. So tame ramification is necessary to be free. Charles Matthews 19:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 21 July 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Galois module be renamed and moved to Galois representation. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Galois module → Galois representation – I think "Galois representation" is more common than "Galois module" even though technically the latter is more general. Taku (talk) 11:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)