Jump to content

Talk:Continental Express

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Untitled

[edit]

Continental Express currently uses both the ERJ 145 LR and the ERJ 145 ER aircraft. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.219.196.189 (talkcontribs) 08:46, 6 April 2005 (UTC-7)

merging

[edit]

same Icao Code Mion 03:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expressjet is the public name doing business as "Continental Express" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.114.240.126 (talkcontribs) 16:44, 2 March 2006 (UTC-7)

  • Potentially not true pretty soon, as other carriers may be contracted to operate as Continental Express. I'm keeping them separate and removing the merge request. FCYTravis 05:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chautauqua airlines will be operating as continental express starting in 2007 as per [1]. Keep the articles seperate! 66.25.30.135 20:49, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTA equals Britt Airways

[edit]

ExpressJet's original certificate holder was an entity called Britt Airways, hence the ICAO: BTA. Even people at Continental don't realize this! Anyways, I'll have to dig up the history of that and put it on here. It is not uncommon for a company to buy up another airline and even cannibalize it for it's operating certificate and union contracts. This is probably the product of some mergers and buyouts over time. Acidradio 03:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should not be merged with ExpressJet

[edit]

ExpressJet is a contractor to Continental, but Chautauqua Airlines has recently begun service under the Continental Express name as well. ExpressJet is currently still providing regional jet service to Continental, but is also operating charter flights under its own name. It is also rumored to begin scheduled passenger service under its own name in early 2007. ExpressJet should be a stand-alone article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.27.102.34 (talk) 07:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Co logo express black 3p.gif

[edit]

Image:Co logo express black 3p.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bye Bye Plane

[edit]

This item should be noted under this section. "Long term historical notability" is very subjective. Also, since this is a current event, it seems awfully dismissive to delete it before legal action or any investigation undertaken by the airline is complete. I have restored this item, with the recommendation that if be revisited in about 3 months to see if anything else has happened in this case. Feel free to discuss. 70.159.43.66 21:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Co logo express black 3p.gif

[edit]

Image:Co logo express black 3p.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Can i post the emergency landing of The Continetal Express Flight 3161 To Memphis it had a Landing gear problem here is the youtube video link

http://youtube.com/watch?v=kd_Vxub6bqU —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecoolman95 (talkcontribs) 15:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]




BetacommandBot 07:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:CO Express ERJ.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:CO Express ERJ.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]