Talk:Ulysses (novel)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• James Joyce reads from Ulysses.ogg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BuySomeApples (talk) 03:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

The first edition of the novel, published 2 February 1922

• ... that the penultimate chapter of James Joyce's novel "Ulysses" is formatted as a "mathematical" catechism of 309 questions and answers? Source: McCarthy, Patrick A., "Joyce's Unreliable Catechist: Mathematics and the Narrative of 'Ithaca'", ELH, Vol. 51, No. 3 (Autumn 1984), pp. 605–606, quoting Joyce in Letters From James Joyce. A famous example is Joyce's apparent rendering of the year 1904 into the impossible Roman numeral MXMIV (p. 669 of the 1961 Modern Library edition)
  • ALT1: ... that "Ithaca", the penultimate episode of James Joyce's "Ulysses", talks of urinary trajectories? Source: Hefferman, James A. W. (2001) Joyce's Ulysses. Chantilly, VA: The Teaching Company LP.
  • ALT2: ... that Episode 14 of James Joyce's "Ulysses" recounts the entire history of the English language through puns and wordplay? Source: Wales, Kathleen (1989). "The "Oxen of the Sun" in "Ulysses": Joyce and Anglo-Saxon". James Joyce Quarterly. 26. 3: 319–330.

Created by ColdSteelKing (talk). Self-nominated at 03:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC).

• Hi ColdSteelKing, this article was not newly created, expanded fivefold, or promoted to Good Article within the last week. It is not eligible for DYK. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

On this (Blooms)day

There's still a week left to address the issues at Wikipedia_talk:Selected_anniversaries/June_16#What,_no_mention_of_Bloomsday? and rescue Bloomsday for the main page. Sparafucil (talk) 22:09, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

article doubled in size since January with added interpretive material

On 25 January the body of this article[1] was 5,982 words. On 20 June the body is 14,190 words.

Most of what has more than doubled the size of the article is the section I broke out from Plot summary into its own Interpretations section. It appears to be primarily devoted to presenting the reading of a scholar named Frederick K. Lang. (Although I can't find a CV or background on him, the press appears legit.)

Nevertheless, there are WP:UNDUE issues—in addition to the tremendous length.

Tagging @User:Quarkny, would you mind sharing a little bit about your project here? The amount of time and work you've put in is incredible — and I very much appreciate the attention to sourcing – but if this material can't be better integrated, seriously condensed, or broken off into another article, it will almost certainly be axed by future editors, which would obviously be a shame.

Cheers, Patrick (talk) 16:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

themes section

I read the Interpretations section with a little more care this morning, and I am not seeing where it might belong on Wikipedia. A better venue might be Medium with a title along the lines of "A Reading of Catholic Themes in James Joyce's Ulysses". Perhaps, though, someone else will have a better idea.

In any case, thinking about what might be appropriately preserved for this article — which is also independently a general suggestion for improvement — I wonder if it might not benefit from a Themes section. This could include 1-3 paragraphs each on such major themes of Ulysses as Catholicism, national identity, the body, gender and sexuality, love, paternity, the vocation of the artist, the anxiety of influence—or whatever editors might want to contribute (until such a time as it, in turn, becomes too long and needs to be cut back or broken off into a child article). For it is in no small part because the novel addresses so many major dimensions of human life that Ulysses has attained the stature it enjoys today.

(For similar reasons, the article would benefit from a Literary Techniques section, upon which there is also a massive secondary literature. But I didn't come to this article with the intention of doing any serious work on it, and so I will leave off further suggestions.)

Cheers, Patrick (talk) 14:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Also, for anyone not aware, the Wikipedia:Manual of Style does have a section specifically devoted to works of fiction: MOS:NOVELS.

I would add that, in the case of Ulysses, a "Literary Influences" section would also be justified. An edit to the Homer material might allow some of the Hamlet material from "Interpretations" to be included here under its own subhead. Gifford's Annotations could also be cited in the section lead on the particular significance of the King James Bible, Blake, and Dante (2nd ed., pp. xvii–xviii). Perhaps some future editor would be inspired to elaborate.

I'll also note that this style guideline supports my suggestion of a "Themes" section, stating, In many ways this is the most important section of the page because it details the "meat" of the novel. We would only need two or three themes to justify the creation of the section, which could be built out over time by future editors.

(Attn: @Quarkny.)

Cheers, Patrick (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)