User talk:Quiensabe

This user may have left Wikipedia. Quiensabe has not edited Wikipedia since 11 May 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the Sandbox.
For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects...

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk

Automotive changes

Thank you for reverting some of 82.42.151.164's changes. I found many errors with them, too, although I must say the user's Belgian, Swiss and Dutch information is quite useful. Stombs 05:54, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)

Mazda 323

Are you sure that photo of the Ford Activa is a 1990? It looks an awful lot like a 2000 or newer Mazda Protege... Oh, and welcome to Wikipedia! --SFoskett 04:16, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)

Good thoughts on the Opel/GM thing. I think we should use "Opel" since that's the "master" version of the cars, and since the "General Motors Astra" doesn't exist... But welcome to the auto-nut fold! --SFoskett 14:20, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)

Holden Zafira

I am 100 per cent certain about the Zafira having been officially sold in New Zealand and having witnessed many on the roads. I'm not sure why you have never seen them on the local site though I recall at one time it was not updated properly. I went in once to look for a certain model that had been launched and it wasn't there.

One user (not me) made an early edit of the Holden page indicating that the Zafira was available in New Zealand, too, so I am not alone.

Here is a reasonably authoritative New Zealand page where the Zafira is road-tested: http://xtramsn.co.nz/motoring/0,,6429-1355700,00.html. It had a retail price of $39,990 in 2002. Stombs 08:55, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Ford Sierras in Brazil

You are right: they weren't Brazilian, but Argentinian (source: World Cars and Auto Katalog). Slight confusion, though this may have been caused by a contemporary American report about Brazilian imports, which was obviously wrong. I'll make the changes. Stombs 08:55, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

UK telephone numbering plan#Crown Dependencies

Re your edit:

It repeats stuff from the top of the article - does it need to be said twice?
Guernsey phones, if I read the BT Archive website aright have always been independant - I don't know about their postal service.
Surely the real reason they are in the UK numbering plan is that it is simpler and cheaper for them than getting their own ISD code. Cf. Liechenstein which hangs on to the Swiss network or Vatican City and San Marino off the Italian.

Would you care to re-word slightly?

It would nice to see a bit in User:Quiensabe about who you are, where you are, etc. - though I will excuse you the mug-shot you are certainly allowed that much anonimity. RHaworth 12:34, 2005 Jan 15 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Next question: do you by any remote chance know where I could find a copy of the UK Telephone Charge Groups Map? My copy is crap - but I still have the cheek to put it on the Web. RHaworth 03:25, 2005 Jan 17 (UTC)

Opel Ascona

Hi Quiensabe: I have reinstated my information on the Chevrolet Chevair and the Vauxhall Manta at the above page and I'm a little unsure why it was deleted. You are right, of course, about the Chevrolet Ascona, which from memory was only a 1.6, while the Chevair had a larger engine—that I have retained. Opel did indeed sell the Manta in the UK but eventually (as I stated) it became the Vauxhall Manta. Stombs 06:55, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for putting me right on that. I apologize: just checked a period Autocar and you are quite correct on the non-existence of the Vauxhall Manta—indeed it was the last Opel-badged car in the UK. I will make the correction once Wikipedia behaves itself and allows edits through. Stombs 00:44, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Taalmonument.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Taalmonument.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Burgundavia 23:45, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)

Tetun

your edit on Portuguese language was not accurate. Tetun follows phonetical caracteristics and not the Portuguese ortography. In Portugal "reconstrucção" is spoken has "reconstrusão", the "c" is mute. -Pedro 02:37, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shit, it is also spelled "reconstrução".Velho 03:05, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt ommit, i reverted it. I just saw you removed a lot of info. You can readd. But honestly to Portugal any problem has reached. I know that when they choose Portuguese the Indonesian speakers didnt like it a lot. But I think that is part of the past. I also know some Australians want to be the next Indonesians. -Pedro 10:20, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Quiensabe, you once more removed information from the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_East_Timor&diff=0&oldid=14339215. And altered to a complete different thing. Why's that? The number of speakers is important. And its massive growth is also important, you should readd that. Plus, the Portuguese and Brazilian teachers were in East Timor to support Timorese teachers. Everyone (even numbers) says their mission was successful, except you. Why did you removed it again? -Pedro 01:41, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Quiensabe, the native language that is spoken in East Timor is called Tetum, not Tetun. - (Aidan Work 00:22, 20 November 2005 (UTC))[reply]

I didn't write that, Pedro did! Quiensabe 16:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rhodesia

Hey, if you're interested, have a look at my Southern Rhodesia draft, and feel free to edit it as you see fit; I esp. need help with the 1888-1923 period — otherwise it is (and has been for nearly a year) mostly finished. Also, you might be interested to glance at the Central African Federation article that I authored a few months ago (and also edit it as you see fit). Regards, El_C 22:05, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yang di-Pertuan Negara

It is to my understanding, that the governor has little representation in this article, the article is regarding the Yang di-Perturn Negara, which has little relation with the governor as politically-corrected in 1959. As for the first Yang di-Pertuan Negara, it was indeed Sir William Goode, of which I have omitted accidentally. However, its worth to be noted that Sir William Goode was sworn in to become the first head of state before democratic election, which under contexts I have referred, do not consider Singapore the State of Singapore, but still a crown colony.

As for the correction you have made, there is no 1959 constitution, but a revised version of 1955, of which was based on the recommendations of the Renden Commission.

As for your comments, it was our honour to have Sir William Goode as our last British head of state; he had himself propagated the independence of Singapore. Slivester 09:06, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian Citizenship

I noticed your change on the history of Canadian citizenship. It's not quite correct to say that Canada was the first Commonwealth nation to enact a nationality law. The Irish Free State had done so in 1935, and although Ireland is not a member of the Commonwealth now, it remained one until 18 April 1949. JAJ 22:04, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Uni/bicameral map?

The file you uploaded should have been uploaded to replace Image:Unibicameral_Map.png on Wikimedia Commons. It is more reasonable to have a language-inspecific pic like that accesible to all the Wikipedias, not just the English one.

Besides, since your map is obviously based on the on already on Commons, I'm not sure you can make it Public Domain instead of GFDL. Your new image is also of a lower resolution, and has a strange shaded box over Rwanda and Burundi. I also see that you colored Bosnia and Herzegovina orange instead of blue in your new image.

I have changed the colors of Egypt, Botswana, Indonesia and Pakistan on Image:Unibicameral_Map.png now and fixed the links on the article pages. —Gabbe 07:05, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've now also fixed the Indonesia islands I missed last time —Gabbe 21:12, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed Kalimantan as well —Gabbe 07:07, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lusophobia

Unless you provide a wikipedia article, with solid references od proof of notability of the term, I am going to delist it. I ave no doubts that there was a dilike of Portugals (like any other major nation), but was this word in notable circulation? mikka (t) 20:34, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

France overseas régions

I am reverting your changes to French overseas régions. A specific infobox for France overseas régions is not needed. It gives the wrong impression that France overseas régions have a specific administrative status, whereas in fact they are just standard régions, like any other French régions. It would be like having a specific "overseas US states" infobox for Hawaii and Alaska. On the other hand, it is true we are losing information with the standard French régions infobox. We need to add a département infobox to the articles Réunion, Guyane, Martinique, and Guadeloupe in order to enter the information that is specific to the départements. I just didn't have the time to do it so far. You can use the standard département infobox (check Haute-Garonne for instance), and put it in the four articles with relevant information. For time zones, country code, etc., you can put them simply in the the article since there is no space for them inside the standard département and région infoboxes. Please note that in any case these subjects are controversial. These overseas régions are not independent countries, and for instance in Réunion many people use .fr for their website, they don't use .re, whereas of course people in favor of independence use .re, etc. I don't think it is a good idea to put controversial things in the infoboxes. Better write it inside the article, and put a little explanation. Hardouin 12:32, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For time zones maybe we can add a new line in the standard French régions infobox, but then that means we need to fill in the line for all 26 régions of France, and check which apply summer daylight saving, and which don't. Hardouin 12:34, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A special government department? What do you mean by that? Again, the status of overseas régions and départements is the same as régions and départements in metropolitan France. The categories "overseas région" and "overseas département" don't exist in French law. Hardouin 01:00, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sources please

In order for "In 1997, a similar operation was performed in the Australian state of Victoria, when a woman's face, torn off in a similar accident, was packed in ice and successfully replanted" to stay at Face transplant something in the way of evidence or a source is needed. Thank you. WAS 4.250 15:06, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the source! After reading it, it seems so similar to the India case that I had to re-read both cases to check if perhaps they were one and the same case but one had misinformation. The difference in dates as well as locations made me think the similarity is probably due to both being caused by exactly the same tragic thing : long flowing female hair caught in the same type farm equipment - pulling the hair at one end and cutting skin tissue below the face - face harvesting machinery - now THAT'S a horror movie! WAS 4.250 16:46, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:150px-RAAF_Roundel.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:150px-RAAF_Roundel.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 05:39, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia in Tetum

Help building a Wikipedia in Tetum, the national language of East Timor. Give your contribution to the improvement of its test page -- Regards, 195.23.53.121 11:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC) Manuel de Sousa[reply]

wikibooks in Tetun

help us building tetun wikibooks.--201.220.215.11 (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Gaelic profanity

I would appreciate your input on the AfD for this article. --MacRusgail 18:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rules of the road

I'd be really grateful if you could add your vote to the renaming of Rules of the road. I notice you've contributed quite a bit to this article, so your vote would be very welcome. Please vote for whichever new name you think is most appropriate. Please vote at Talk:Rules_of_the_road#Renaming_this_article_-_poll. NFH 20:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mazda121nz1990.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mazda121nz1990.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~MDD 46 96 01:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar

What is your complaint regarding the Gibraltar infobox? Perhaps you could share the 'joke' ? --Gibnews 07:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was not with any information about Gibraltar, it was the infobox template itself, which is less user-friendly than previous ones.

The information about it being a UK overseas territory is displayed twice (which is why I put ) but when I tried to delete it, it created spaces for {{{established_events}}} {{{established_dates}}} I have no issues at all with the status of Gibraltar, or with the data contained in the infobox - in fact, I wanted to enter information for National Day being on 10th September.Quiensabe 16:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]

No problem, was curious about the detail - that infobox is a cryptic area that gave me hell trying to update too, will have another poke at it. National day used to be in there.--Gibnews 08:29, 5 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Just had a go at that infobox and think its better now, take a look. Although don't understand templates but known to hack things :) --Gibnews 09:25, 9 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]

I included a short section and a picture about Gibraltar National Day, although its not currently linked. Spent too much time on that infobox ! All help appreciated.--Gibnews 17:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Interster

Hallo - don't know if you've happened to see the message on the Talk:Interster page? It appears to be from a librarian called Ann, posted on behalf of a library user seeking more info about the programme. Humansdorpie 17:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lusophobia

The article you created about lusophobia is listed for deletion, mainly, because you added no references to it, therefore, it looks like original research. If you can reference the article, do it, otherwise it may be deleted. Thanks! Afonso Silva 21:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope your work saved the article. If you could present even more references, that would be great. But anyaway, you did a nice job. Cheers! Afonso Silva 12:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I Am Not Canadian

Please don't copy copyright lyrics into the article, per Wikipedia:Lyrics and poetry. Unless the lyics are available under an open content licence, they cannot be freely reproduced on Wikipedia. Thanks. --Madchester 04:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics from both the original and parody have been removed. They are copyrighted by the respective authors. --Madchester 04:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dagenh.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dagenh.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 13:15, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Passport-tl.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Passport-tl.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Spartaz 12:14, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.

Unilateral removal of the history section in ABC article

Hi Quiensabe

We have an unpleasant situation about to develop over this action by one "cyberjunkie" ("cj"), who decided all of a sudden that he'd move the entire History section of the ABC article to a new daughter article, without replacing it with a summary. The history section was almost entirely written more than a year ago.

Since this action on 12 September, the section has languished with no text at all under its title, save a link to the daughter article.The action has, in effect, gutted the article, leaving what appear to be insubstantial fragments without a core. It's must be odd to the newcomer to be denied a summary of the history and to move straight onto a chunky section on "funding and relationship with government" without knowing where how the institution arose.

Now, it's not that I disagree with him that the History section was written in greater detail than you'd normally expect in summary style. (A related issue is that the rest of the article may need to be fleshed out in the opposite direction to achieve satisfactory summary coverage of the topic—perhaps the optimal balance needs to be debated on the talk page.) What I do object to is

(1) his failure to raise the matter on the talk page beforehand, and
(2) provide replacement text with the summary style that he's using as his stated rationale for the removal.

The edit comment for the removal was "split (will summarise later)", whereas I'd have been pleased to see a summary written before the removal, for immediate replacement.

I've raised the matter on the talk page, and Cyberjunkie has responded negatively:

I think a total blank is worse than a long history. Please create a summary soon. Your action has resulted in damage to the overall article, IMV. Tony 11:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Whereas, I disagree. --cj | talk 12:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I can see that this is getting nowhere. I wonder whether you agree that he should either undertake to write a summary section in the near future (I suggest three or four paragraphs) or reinstate the text and raise the issue on the talk page.

I'd appreciate knowing your opinion. The ABC's talk page is here. Tony 14:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Edit to Spelling reforms of Portuguese

Hi, Quiensabe. I noticed your recent edit to Spelling reforms of Portuguese. I had decided not to speak of ll and ñ on purpose, because, in the early medieval period of Spanish and Portuguese, other spellings were also used in competition with those for the palatal consonants. For example, nn, and I think ni were used instead of ñ by some authors. However, I have not researched this yet. Perhaps you know. Regards. FilipeS 19:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Quiensabe, I redirected your user page to your talk page since many users have used your user page as a place for discussions. If this was in error, please contact me. s d 3 1 4 1 5 final exams! 21:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're Invited!

Hi,

Thanks for your post on Languages of Indonesia here. You are very right about how languages in China and Indonesia considered as dialects are actually distinct languages. I recognize this false claim due to an over extent of nationlistic fervor in a lot of countries. Anyways, I have formed a group called WikiProject Dravidian civilizations, a first of its kind. It is to promote the not so heard of, or should I say neglected indigenous civilizations of South Asia. I am also planning on forming a WikiProject Malayo-Polynesian group that will focus on the civilizations of the Indonesian islands, Malaysia, Borneo, and the South Pacific. If you are interested in joining our group, please visit us here] and post your name in the members section. Regards. Wiki Raja 21:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Cybersky

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cybersky, by Nuttah68 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cybersky seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cybersky, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

AfD nomination of Politics of Australia and Canada compared

An article that you have been involved in editing, Politics of Australia and Canada compared, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics of Australia and Canada compared. Thank you. AndrewRT(Talk) 00:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Greenland

Thanks for that. I guess the more accurate point is that Greenland has much less independence than, say, New Zealand or Australia, but still has a similar structure. There's a sort of continuum about it that creates confusion. --Lholden 21:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Overseas Région of France

A tag has been placed on Template:Overseas Région of France requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TVNZ Logo

I uploaded the exact same logo and put it on the page. It was taken off due to vandalism and you have put another one in its place. The original image was on there first and there is no need to replace it because it is exactly the same. Next time you might want to look at the page history before you upload an image that has already been put on the article. But Thanks for the thought. Cheers. wwesocks 04:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TVNZ7.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TVNZ7.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Damon Gameau

A tag has been placed on Damon Gameau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 08:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Dagenhpants.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Dagenhpants.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 13:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Oldsabclogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oldsabclogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese embassy in the Philippines

Hi, I would like to ask what proof do you have that the Portuguese embassy in the Philippines was closed in 2007? According to both websites of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Portugal and of the Philippines, they both state that the embassy still remains. Please show me where you received your information. Thanks. Aquintero (talk) 15:38, 11 October, 2008 (UTC)

RS?

You have offered POV for the Indonesian Malaysian difference article and although you might consider yourself right on the matter - as a malaysian language taught australian who has lived in Indonesia I beg to differ - dont be suprised if your edit is reverted. To save it - rather than re-writing - you need to provide WP:RS on such a matter if you do not want your edit to be reverted - your opinion could be as valid as my experience which does not agree - you need sources/cites for such a matter - thanks Satu Suro 00:48, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, however, I would regard this sentence as POV - For non native Indonesians and Malays, the languages seem similar, but for native users, the differences are disturbing when used for a deep verbal conversation or during written communication. My editing was more a rewording than my own opinion.

Also, as someone from the UK who grew up in Singapore and visited Malaysia and Indonesia regularly, I've never heard anyone refer to the Malay language in English as 'Malaysian', only as Bahasa Malaysia, and only then in Malaysia itself. I suppose it could be called that, just as the language of Indonesia is called Indonesian, but I don't think it'd be popular in Singapore and Brunei, where it has always been know as Malay. Terima kasih banyak.Quiensabe (talk) 08:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding - aspects of this subject have at times been probematic, so I do appreciate your response.

Well terima kasih banyak is telling :) - what we are touching on has previously wasted a huge amount of space and time between fiercely xenophobic malays and indonesians with very limited english - so I withdraw my challenge to revert your edit (although I believe your removal of the spelling section was misguided) - in Australia and Java I have heard sufficient variants on what we are discussing to go against any common practices or general usages in singapore, malaysia and brunei - and in the end you havent specifically offered anything that resembles RS (The original point is for whatever our experiences might tell us - WP:V is a requirement against WP:OR and other various misdemenours - which is typical for the whole malaysian and indonesian wiki projects - so I rest my case - andecdotal information for a pair of projects with a very large number of articles that have not a single reliable source amongst them - more appropriately - cheers and hope you are able to offer something like a source sometime Satu Suro 09:10, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry forgot to put about the diffs (ie intelligibility between malay and indonesian) - I totally disagree - but havent a ref to stand on so ill leave off any further issue with the whole thing for the moment - thanks again for taking time to respond Satu Suro 09:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My sincerest apologies i do have difficulties at times checking history/diffs - sorry about accusing you of something you didnt do! thank you so much for your civility - hey maybe one day we'll meet at an edit we both totally agree needs some better work - and get if fixed - sorry to have taken so much of your time up - cheers Satu Suro 14:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:911ct supporters

Template:911ct supporters has been nominated for deletion by Ice Cold Beer. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in Template:911ct, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of David Shayler, following the guideline on multiple messages.) — Regards. Cs32en 18:19, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dublin7.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dublin7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 13:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Uktv.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Uktv.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Gregshackleton.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Gregshackleton.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 18:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daewoo Royale reply

Hello, Quiensabe. You have new messages at OSX's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AfD nomination of Voseo

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Voseo. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voseo. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of I Am Not Canadian

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is I Am Not Canadian. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am Not Canadian. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Quiensabe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Shawn Slovo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

+44 (disambiguation)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of +44 (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: +44. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

+44 was originally a disambiguation page and then, late in 2009, someone copied the contents of +44 (band) and pasted into +44 and made +44 (band) into a redirect to +44. Later, in January 2010, someone else reverted the changes to +44 to make it again into a disambiguation page. However, this created a fork of the article originally found at +44 (band) and edits continued on both branches of the fork. These changes were reverted by a Wikipedia administrator such that +44 again became a disambiguation page and +44 (band) reverted to the contents about the punk band of that name, as of November, 2009.

By now making +44 into a redirect to Telephone_numbers_in_the_United_Kingdom this not only removes the disambiguation link to +44 (band) but it also, potentially, could precipitate an edit war with the followers of the band +44 (band). The existence of +44 (disambiguation) appears to be an unnecessary duplication. Enquire (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of +44 (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on +44 (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Jeandré (talk), 2010-02-07t08:39z 08:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re [1], see Talk:+44. -- Jeandré (talk), 2010-02-07t11:02z

Recent Changes Camp Canberra Aug 11, 2010

I saw your edits on the University of Canberra WP entry, and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this: RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010. ABOUT | REGISTRATION | SCHEDULE

Hope we'll see you and friends there. Leighblackall (talk) 00:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppet editing

There is an open WP:SPI case looking at sockpuppet editing primarily on the Johann Hari/ Talk page. As you edited the Johann Hari/Talk page between 2004 and 2011, your input is welcomed.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Philippe Legrain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited British Freedom Party, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Freedom and Unity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Sanskrit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bahasa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2

Hi. When you recently edited New Zealand Post Office, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Hunt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. When you recently edited Xanana Gusmão, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page His Excellency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Denis Worrall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Benoni and Transvaal

House of Representatives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to House of Delegates and General Assembly

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. When you recently edited Malcolm (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Flemington and Collingwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. When you recently edited Richard James Wilkinson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Malaya and CMG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. When you recently edited Queen of Malta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Her Majesty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Commonwealth of Britain Bill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of the People (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. When you recently edited Transfer of sovereignty over Macau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Right- and left-hand traffic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Underground railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tetum language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Zimbabwe vehicle registration plate format 2006-.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Zimbabwe vehicle registration plate format 2006-.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Hi, thanks for your work on WP. Just a brief reminder that we don't normally link years, dates, or common terms (including well-known country-names). Best wishes. Tony (talk) 08:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trinidad and Tobago (Commonwealth Realm)

Whilst it is absolutely true that Dominica became a republic on independence and was thus never a Commonwealth Realm itself, I don't see how that has any relevance to the fact that Trinidad and Tobago to date is the only Commonwealth Realm in the caribbean which has abolished its monarchy.

JWULTRABLIZZARD (talk) 12:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Telephone Numbers in Malta

The Telephone numbers in Malta article was recently deleted, see this edit. This article is not a duplicate and should not have been deleted. Soon after the original content had been restored it was again deleted in error.

Rather than reverse the previous erroneous deletion, you have recently created a brand new page here. You may not have been aware of the prior history. Thanks for stepping in and editing. The new page doesn't use any of the material from the old page. Is that intentional? -- 109.176.190.248 (talk) 18:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oldsabclogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oldsabclogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]