Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Middle Ages/New Articles
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Should we remove some of these articles from the list, after they are no longer "new"? Maybe we should list them by month or something...although I know I frequently find relatively new articles from earlier in the year. Or should we just keep listing them the way we are now? Adam Bishop 20:57, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- An issue that must be faced eventually. Why not remove them after, say, two months? Keeps us on our toes. We can add any to our watchlists in the course of two months. Sensible? --Wetman 23:45, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I thought it was helpful for new or prospective members to have somthing to browse through. Perhaps we should archive. 2 months would be 6 archives a year. Perhaps quarterly? Trade off between too many archives and too-long list, or we archive once it reaches X articles, or when someone feels so inclined like with talk pages when it reaches the 32k limit. Stbalbach 02:32, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Subtlety
[edit]Someone hinted at a move to subtlety (dish). Is there need for it when there is no other article on it? I don't know of too many other encyclopedic definitions for subtlety that would be relevant.